Home
Archive
I Archive
II Archive
IV
Archive
III
The
Real Impact Of Gay Marriage On Society
by Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
Open
letter to the people of Spain
by Laura Mansfield
Is
Mexico Thwarting U.S. Immigration Enforcement?
Kerry’s
Uncommon Touch
Besides the flip-flops, John Kerry has another big problem: how his life
in the Senate has prepared him for connecting with ordinary Americans.
by Hugh Hewitt
GLOBAL
JIHAD
Islamists rape 100 women in attack
U.N. sees ‘ethnic cleansing’ in ‘world’s greatest humanitarian crisis’
Where
the Dem Was:
John Kerry chose not to support our troops By Barbara Comstock
As
you probably know, the liberal-secularist crowd doesn’t believe in evil…if
they don’t believe in evil, do they believe in good? Gibson
convinced
‘evil all around us’
Film director says Bible ‘R-rated book,’ people susceptible to unseen
influences
BRAVE
NEW SCHOOLS
Homosexual book
for 1st-graders
Parents outraged over story where prince finds love with another prince
DAY
OF INFAMY 2001
Official: Kerry failed
to act on pre-9/11 tip
3rd agent to say he warned security lapses made Boston airport ripe for
‘jihad’ attack
Oil
for Scandal
Where’s Jesse Helms when the U.N. really needs him?
A
Clear Choice
John Kerry “speaks as if only those who openly oppose America’s objectives
have a chance of earning his respect.” by Dick Cheney
Pro-Kerry
Historian: Kerry Lies About Anti-war Activities by Marc Morano
A
WIN FOR TERROR by David Frum
Secular
Absolutism
The irreligious left tries to impose its religious views on everyone else
Save
Marriage? It’s Too Late The Pill made same-sex nuptials inevitable
NBC:
Clinton Ordered bin Laden Spared
Kerry
Caught in Whopper Trying to Get the Cuban Vote
Thanks
also to the nitwit faculty members and empty headed students of Evergreen,
as well.
A
Tribute to Rachel Corrie
Thanks for showing us what “peace” really means BY RUHAMA SHATTAN
- And
the Endorsements Roll In - Spanish
Bush-Whacking - Get
a Permission Slip First -
Europe’s
Favorite Son -
One
Face -
Another
Face -
And
Another Face…one of us -
Gutless
-
Spineless
-
The
World According to Kerry -
Muntiny
on the McCain -
Patronizing
the “colored” kids -
Wisdom
by George -
Liberal
Intelligence -
Crooked
Liar Defends Crooked Liar Comment -
Iraq:
One Year Later -
Axis
of Weasels Grows By One -
Triple
Flip-Flop with a Twist -
Yup,
that About Sums it Up -
Hybrid
Hypocrites – From the Left Coast Report -
White
Rabbit Republicans On Drugs -
Social
Security – Via Email
On
this page
AND
THE ENDORSEMENTS ROLL IN
“…one
recent endorsement we think deserves more attention is that of Massachusetts
Sen. John Kerry by North Korea’s Kim Jong-il. It’s not that
one of the world’s last Stalinists called a press conference and
made an announcement. But the dictator’s preference for Kerry over
President Bush is evident, according to a report in The Financial Times,
by the fawning treatment Kerry is getting on North Korea’s state-run
media.” For the complete article,
click
here
SPANISH
BUSH-WHACKING
“(L)ike the Democrats, the Spanish hate George
Bush more than they hate the terrorists.” – Columnist Ann Coulter
GET A PERMISSION SLIP FIRST
“If he is elected president, Sen. John Kerry
would return American decision-making to the dithering and powerless United
Nations, which is precisely what America’s enemies would like to see.”
– Columnist Cal Thomas
OLD
EUROPE’S FAVORITE SON
“According to Kerry, foreign leaders are lining
up to tell him, ‘You gotta win this, you gotta beat this guy [President
Bush].’ And why might this be? Because, explain these foreign leaders
to the Democratic nominee, ‘We need a new policy.’ Now wait a minute,
did I get that right? That foreign leaders need a new U.S. policy and
that this is a good reason to vote for Kerry? I don’t mean to sound heedless
of the opinions of mankind, but I’m honestly not sure many Americans care
whether foreign leaders want ‘a new policy’ in this country.” – Columnist
Adam Wolfson, National Review Online
ONE FACE
“I actually did vote for the $87 billion before
I voted against it.” – John Kerry on his vote on the supplemental
request for money to fund pay raises and body armor for troops in Iraq
ANOTHER
FACE
“Yesterday Senator John Kerry changed his mind and now supports the
ban on gay marriages. I’m telling you this guy has more positions than
Paris Hilton.” – Late Show host David Letterman
AND ANOTHER FACE THAT TELLS US HE IS JUST ONE OF
US
“Dem candidate-in-waiting John Kerry is set
for a 5-day luxury break at his Sun Valley, Idaho compound after a week
riddled with gaffes, missteps and slippage in the polls. Gorgeous, 19.5
rooms at 7,749 square-feet, with a market value of $4.9 million [property
taxes of more than $30,000 annually], Kerry’s Idaho vacation getaway will
be the setting of a Spring Break regroup and unwind, sources tell the
DRUDGE REPORT.” – Drudge Report, 3/17/04
Photo stolen from Rush
Limbaugh
GUTLESS
“Spain, once the land of conquistadors and
conquest, is now ground zero for gutless cowardice in the face of terror.”
– Columnist Michael Graham
SPINELESS
“Another day, another bombing by Al-Qaeda. A huge car bomb tore through
Baghdad last night, killing 27 people. And what was the target of the
cowardly Islamic terrorists? A military installation? A government office?
Some other military target? Of course not, why it was an unguarded hotel
filled with innocent civilians. . . . Those of you who think this election
is about health care, jobs and other worthless political issues need to
take note: Islamic terrorism is not going to go away, and we are next.
. . . If we don’t continue cleaning house in the Middle East, this is
going to keep happening. What’s it going to take for the spineless weasels
on the left to get that through their thick skull?” – Talk-show host
Neal Boortz
THE WORLD ACCORDING TO KERRY
“That ultimatum (by President Bush for Saddam to leave Iraq or be
forcibly removed) came one year ago today–twelve months in which Saddam
went from palace, to bunker, to spider hole, to jail. A year ago, he was
the all-powerful dictator of Iraq, controlling the lives and the future
of almost 25 million people. Today, the people of Iraq know that the dictator
and his sons will never torment them again. And we can be certain that
they will never again threaten Iraq’s neighbors or the United States of
America. . . . Had the decision belonged to Sen. Kerry, Saddam Hussein
would still be in power, today, in Iraq. In fact, Saddam Hussein would
almost certainly still be in control of Kuwait.
“…On national security, the senator has shown at least one measure
of consistency. Over the years, he has repeatedly voted against weapons
systems for the military. He voted against the Apache helicopter, against
the Tomahawk cruise missile, against even the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
He has also been a reliable vote against military pay increases–opposing
them no fewer than 12 times. Many of these very weapons systems have been
used by our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and are proving to be valuable
assets in the war on terror.”
– Vice President Dick Cheney at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
and Museum in Simi Valley, Calif., 3/17/04
MUTINY ON THE McCAIN
“A day after Vice President Dick Cheney delivered a devastating attack
on Sen. John Kerry’s defense and national security records, Sen. John
McCain is coming to Kerry’s defense. McCain told NBC Thursday morning
that he doesn’t believe that Kerry is ‘necessarily weak on defense’
— even though he says they disagree on some issues, according to the
Associated Press.” – NewsMax.com, 3/18/04
PATRONIZING THE “COLORED” KIDS
“The ad in USA Today wasn’t headlined ‘For Blacks and Hispanics,
These Kids Are Pretty Smart’ — but it might as well have been. The
full-page layout trumpeted the 32 college students selected as finalists
in the American Advertising Federation’s annual ‘Most Promising Minority
Students Program.’ . . . Perhaps the 32 students hailed in the ad
really are gifted whiz kids with a genius for advertising — but when
the competition excludes more than 70 percent of the field, how would
one know? (According to the American Council on education, ‘students
of color’ account for 28 percent of all undergraduates, and just
21.8 percent of all bachelor’s degrees awarded.)” – Boston Globe
columnist Jeff Jacoby
WISDOM
BY GEORGE
In his Farewell Address he warned against passionate attachments to other
countries lest these facilitate “the illusion of an imaginary common
interest in cases where no common interest exists.”
LIBERAL
INTELLIGENCE
“Republicans might be heathens and out to destroy all that we hold
dear, but that doesn’t mean we need to take them seriously. Or be
bitter or vituperative just because they are swine. I think one can still
have friends who are Republicans.” – Lake Wobegone author Garrison
Keillor
Gee,
I’m so happy that I can still be a friend of a left-wing wacko.
CROOKED
LIAR DEFENDS CROOKED LIAR COMMENT
“Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, said Sunday that
presumptive Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry was right when
he branded Republicans as ‘the most crooked, you know, lying group
I have ever seen.’ Calling Mr. Kerry’s comment ‘quite descriptive
of reality,’ Mrs. Clinton told an audience at Boston’s Kennedy Center
that the senator from Massachusetts had been targeted by the same ‘vast
right-wing conspiracy’ that impeached her husband, Newsmax.com reports.”
– Greg Pierce’s “Inside Politics,” 3/16/04
IRAQ:
ONE YEAR LATER
“The (Iraq) war demonstrated the formidable power of the U.S. military.
The monstrous extent of Saddam’s savagery was made public with the discovery
of mass graves. We now know that he managed to corrupt the U.N. itself,
along with some leading politicians in its member states. The world, in
short, looks a lot different than it did a year ago. What we know now
is that ‘multilateralism’ — the code word for going to the
U.N. — doesn’t solve problems. It just buries them. . . . The obvious
conclusion: America has no choice but to lead. The United Nations, for
all its failures, is a sometimes useful adjunct. But it is no substitute.
And neither is that favorite notion of the left, ‘multilateralism.’
“ – Wall Street Journal columnist George Melloan
AXIS
OF WEASELS GROWS BY ONE
“The Spanish voters did the world a favor with their Sunday surprise:
These are the Europeans that John Kerry wants to depend on when the going
gets tough. America deserves better, even if John Kerry doesn’t think
so. The new government in Madrid can’t wait to join France and Germany
in the axis of weasels… This is the face of appeasement, poltroonery
and cowardice unmasked, and you can smell the fear and funk from here.
Senator Kerry, a bit of an aspiring weasel himself, hurried to make a
clumsy attempt to exploit the tragedy in Madrid as a mark against George
W. Bush.” – Wesley Pruden, “Pruden On Politics,” 3/16/04
TRIPLE
FLIP-FLOP WITH A TWIST
In an interview with WPLG-ABC 10 reporter Michael Putney in Miami recently,
Democrat presidential candidate John Kerry sought to boost his bona fides
with the region’s large anti-Castro Cuban community by saying, “I
voted for the Helms-Burton legislation to be tough on companies that deal
with him (Castro).” But as the Miami Herald noted, “There is
only one problem: Kerry voted against it.” Oops. There he goes again.
Then there’s the little matter of the terrified little Cuban boy
Elian Gonzalez who was forcefully returned to Castro’s Cuba at gunpoint
by Janet Reno’s Justice Department and Bill Clinton’s White
House. According to Greg Pierce of “Inside the Beltway,” Kerry
“took both sides of the issue” when asked about it. He was opposed
to sending little Elian back…but he was in favor of it also. Boggles
the mind.
YEP, THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP
“Firefighters earn the thanks of all who’ve needed their services,
but their union is a typical government employee’s union — it’s always
on the side of higher taxes, bigger spending, and usually screaming at
the top of its lungs in cruder fashion than any other interest group in
the room.” – John Fund, Political Diary, 3/16/-4
HYBRID
HYPOCRITES – FROM THE LEFT COAST REPORT
Looks
as if Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Sting, Robin Williams and other celebs
are leaving their Bentleys, Alpha Romeos and T-Birds in their 20-something
garages and tooling around town in their eco-sensitive Toyota Priuses.
Vincent
Gallo is part of a Tinseltown conservative renegade brigade. The actor-director-musician
recently told the Washington Times of the folly of Hollywood’s hybrid
fad.
“I
went to the Oscars this year and there were groups of actors showing up
in these hybrid vehicles,” Gallo said. “I’m not going to name
names. But not one of these clowns has been on a private plane less than
25 times. It’s one of those great radical clichés of good will
that they have in Hollywood. It is a pathology. They want to feel good
about something.”
Gallo
shared an observation about shrines of the ex-prez that are on display
in the offices and homes of a lot of entertainment bigwigs.
“I’ve
seen more pictures of him, you know, the autographed photos, with like
these sleazy babes,” Gallo explained. “I mean pictures of a
former president with two of these babes hanging on him. Can you imagine
going to someone’s home and seeing a picture of Nixon with two hookers?”
The
Left Coast Report points out that, whether we’re talking about the Hollywood
silly or the Slick Willie, hype is the name of the ego-driven game.
WHITE
RABBIT REPUBLICANS ON DRUGS
by Chuck Muth
March 21, 2004
According to Grace Slick (ask your dad), one pill
makes you larger and one pill makes you small, but the ones mother gives
you don’t do anything at all. Now if only the drug companies would
invent a pill which cures “liberalitis,” because the disease
seems to be spreading in epidemic proportions throughout the ranks of
congressional Republicans. Here’s the latest case in point…
Do you still get “sticker-shock” when you see the price of a
new car? Yeeoww! The first house I lived in cost less than a new Ford
Explorer. You know, if only those dang auto manufacturers would just stop
paying for all those cheesy television commercials, maybe you and I could
afford one.
For that matter, have you seen the price of a beer these days? Outrageous.
If Budweiser would just stop fritting away all that money on Clydesdales
and talking frog commercials, maybe it wouldn’t cost us poor working
slobs an arm and leg at Miller Time.
In fact, there ought to be a law.
Indeed, it’s time for Congress to look into how we can stop these
beer and car companies from spending so much money on advertising, which
only jacks up the cost of their products. No, better yet, let’s just
ban ALL advertising and force companies to use the savings to reduce the
cost of their products. Who’s with me?
OK, Nader, put your hand down.
But the rest of you should clearly see that this ridiculous notion – having
the government tell an industry how much it can spend advertising its
products – is the epitome of anti-business, nanny-state, busy-body liberalism.
Yet that’s exactly what the National Republican Congressional Committee
(NRCC) is now telling Republican members of Congress to say on the campaign
trail. I kid you not.
In a “talking points” briefing recently distributed by Carl
Forti of the NRCC’s Communications Division, the GOP leadership advises
members on how to handle a raft of questions concerning health care in
general, and the new prescription drug entitlement in particular. If a
constituent pops up, say at a town hall meeting, and asks, “Why can
drug companies spend so much on advertising?” the NRCC is telling
its members to answer thusly: “Like you, I believe that drug companies
spend too much on advertising…and agree that this is something we need
to look into.”
What? When did it become the official Republican position that the government
should regulate the amount businesses can, or even should, spend on advertising?
Did I miss a memo somewhere? And would somebody please help Sen. Goldwater
stop turning over in his grave.
It appears the GOP leadership needs to be taken to Ronald Reagan’s
woodshed for a refresher course on Liberal Economics 101: “If it
moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it.” This is NOT, however, the way Republicans are supposed
to view the free-market economy, no matter what their pollsters are telling
them.
Unfortunately, the left has done such a great job demonizing the evil
drug companies – you know, those rats who produce all those wonderful
life-saving, life-extending and life-enhancing drugs – that even some
libertarian-conservatives want Big Pharma’s scalp. Indeed, a recent
online survey of our Citizen Outreach activists (www.citizenoutreach.com)
– a decidedly limited-government group of people – showed that almost
3/4 of folks thought the drug companies were spending too much money on
advertising.
You see how dangerous a disease liberalitis is? It strikes the unwary
when they least expect it and causes otherwise level-headed members of
the vast right-wing conspiracy to go meshugana. The next thing you know,
folks will be supporting an outright ban on prescription drug advertising.
Heck, they’ve already done it to the Marlboro Man and Jack Daniels.
Why not Viagra, as well? Then what: Big Macs?
Don’t laugh. It’s coming. The dangerous notion that drug companies
are spending “too much” on advertising and Congress needs to
“look into” it starts us down a very slippery slope.
But just to show I’m not completely unreasonable on this subject,
there IS one advertising ban I could support: On the government-monopoly
known as the Post Office. Since no private business is allowed to compete
with USPS for the delivery of mail, why do they need to spend millions
of dollars on Lance Armstrong’s bike team? If Congress won’t
clamp down on USPS advertising, then they should keep their big fat camel’s
noses out of the advertising tents of drug companies.
SOCIAL
SECURITY – Via Email from a Friend
I
know that you know this, but it pays to remember!
Q:
Which party took Social Security from an independent fund and put it in
the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic-controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which party put a tax on Social Security?
A: The Democratic party.
Q: Which party increased the tax on Social Security?
A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the deciding vote.
Q Which party decided to give your Social Security money to immigrants?
A: That’s right, the Democratic Party. Immigrants that move into this
country at 65 get SSI and have never paid a dime into the system. This
is costing us millions of dollars. Then, after doing all this, the Democrats
turn around and tell you the Republicans want to take your Social Security
away from you. The worst part about it is that people forget who did what!
What can you do?
Circulate this to remind people so they’ll remember it during the November
vote.
Vote Like Our Country’s Very Existence Depends On It…Because IT DOES
!!!
| On other pages |